🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.